See why ACA Insight is the leading newsletter on regulatory compliance. Sign up for a free 1-week trial.

The weekly news source for investment management legal and compliance professionals

Topic: 12b-1 Fees

SEC Will Not Fine Advisers that Self-Report Share Class Violations by June 12

February 23, 2018
Itís a limited time offer. The SECís Division of Enforcement will not impose financial penalties against advisory firms that voluntarily report placing clients in certain share classes when less expensive share classes for the same investment are available. Advisers taking advantage of this offer will still have to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest, be censured and face the possibility of individual liability.

Read More

SEC Catches a Big Fish in Its 12b-1 Fee Dragnet

April 14, 2017
The SEC shows no sign of letting up in its scrutiny of investment advisory firms that place clients in more expensive share classes when less expensive class shares of the same securities are available. It reached a settlement with a small, financially troubled adviser last month, and early this month settled charges with a large financial institution, Credit Suisse, and one of its investment adviser representatives.

Read More

No Disgorgement or Fines for Adviser in 12b-1 Fee Settlement

April 7, 2017
It was just nine months ago that the SEC issued a risk alert saying it would be looking hard at advisory firms that failed to disclose when placing clients in mutual fund share classes that are more expensive than others Ė and only three weeks later charged an adviser for doing just that. On March 29, however, that firm, in a settlement with the agency, walked away without having to provide disgorgement or pay any fines.

Read More

12b-1 Fee and Reverse Churning Allegations Dominate SEC Case against Advisers

March 25, 2016
Allegations involving multiple SEC red flags came together this month when the agency reached a settlement with three AIG Advisor Group subsidiaries. The areas of SEC interest include placement of clients in funds with 12b-1 fees when less expensive funds are available, dually registered advisers involved in reverse churning, and advisers that fail to follow through on examination deficiencies.

Read More

SEC Alleges Conflict of Interest In Adviser Favoring 12b-1 Funds Over Others

January 22, 2016
Thereís nothing wrong with putting clients into funds that charge fees for distribution Ė as long as you first let your clients know of any other funds you manage that do not charge such fees. Itís also probably best to if your firm didnít receive those distribution fees.

Read More

Distribution Fees: New Mutual Fund Guidance Clarifies Board and Adviser Roles

January 8, 2016
Itís the job of a mutual fundís board of directors to police how shares are sold, and itís the job of the fundís adviser to provide the board with sufficient information to make that determination. That is the essence of the guidance update, "Mutual Fund Distribution and Sub-Accounting Fees," issued January 6 by the SECís Division of Investment Management.

Read More

Distribution Fees: Don’t Disguise Them as Something Else

May 8, 2015
The SEC doesnít like it when funds and advisers say they are paying for one kind of service when they actually are paying for another. Payments for sales of mutual fund shares are a case in point.

Read More